Why 95% of AI Projects Fail, And What Day One Should Actually Look Like
This article originally appeared on Edge Signals – Bart Lehane’s LinkedIn newsletter on customer experience, analytics, and AI. Follow for
Contact centres use voice of customer (VoC) analytics by systematically collecting and analysing signals from every support interaction, like calls, chats, emails, to identify recurring themes, root causes of contact, and customer sentiment at scale. Those insights are then shared with product, operations, and leadership teams, so that what customers say in individual conversations becomes…

Contact centres use voice of customer (VoC) analytics by systematically collecting and analysing signals from every support interaction, like calls, chats, emails, to identify recurring themes, root causes of contact, and customer sentiment at scale. Those insights are then shared with product, operations, and leadership teams, so that what customers say in individual conversations becomes strategic intelligence. When it works well, support stops being a cost centre and starts being the most reliable source of truth the business has.
Ask a customer what they think and you get a survey response. Watch what they actually do when something goes wrong and you get the truth. That is the core premise: instead of waiting for customers to fill in a form, you listen to what they are already telling you every time they contact your support team.
In a contact centre context, VoC analytics means treating every conversation as a data point. An AI layer reads or listens to those conversations, classifies them by topic and intent, detects sentiment, and surfaces patterns that would be invisible to any individual agent or manager. The output is a running, quantified picture of what is frustrating your customers, what is confusing them, and what is driving them to get in touch in the first place.
This is different from traditional contact centre reporting, which tells you how the operation is performing: handle times, queue lengths, first contact resolution rates. VoC analytics asks a different question entirely. It asks why customers are contacting you, and what that reveals about the product, the policy, or the experience you are delivering.
The distinction matters because you can have a perfectly efficient contact centre that is handling enormous volumes of entirely avoidable contact. Strong operational metrics and a broken customer experience are not mutually exclusive. VoC analytics is how you find out which one you actually have.
Learn more: Voice of the Customer Programs Explained: Challenges, Insights, and How to Get It Right
The mechanics are more straightforward than they might appear, though they require the right infrastructure at each stage. Most mature VoC programmes in contact centres follow a similar sequence:
The whole process runs continuously as a live feed reflecting what is happening in your customer base right now.
The scale of the opportunity is significant. According to McKinsey, contact centres that implement speech analytics effectively achieve cost savings of between 20 and 30 percent, alongside customer satisfaction improvements of 10 percent or more. Grand View Research estimates the global contact centre analytics market was worth around $1.9 billion in 2024 and is growing at over 20 percent annually, the clearest possible signal that businesses are starting to take this data seriously.
The pattern tends to look similar across industries. A contact centre team has had a nagging sense for months that something specific is driving unnecessary volume, like a confusing step in the checkout, a policy that customers keep misreading, a feature that behaves unexpectedly. Agents know it. Supervisors have heard it. But no one has been able to quantify it clearly enough to build a business case for change.
VoC analytics provides the quantification. It turns the accumulated pattern-recognition of a contact centre floor into hard data, the kind that gets product or operations teams to act. In most cases, the insight itself is not the surprise. What surprises people is seeing how large the problem actually is.
Below are examples from organisations that have been through this, split between EdgeTier customers and independent cases from the wider industry.
Electric Ireland is Ireland’s largest energy provider, handling close to a million calls a year alongside hundreds of thousands of emails and chats. When the energy crisis accelerated in 2021 and 2022, contact volumes rose sharply; residential calls up 35% in a single year, then another 28% the year after. Email response times that had once been 24 hours stretched to 10-15 days. CSAT, predictably, fell hard.
The underlying problem was not the team or the processes. It was visibility. The QA function was working from manual call samples, and reporting landed monthly. By the time a pattern was identified, it could already be five to seven weeks old.
“We thought at the time that we were putting the customer at the fore. We thought we were doing things right. But in hindsight, we really weren’t because we had no real-time insights whatsoever into customer issues.” – Debbie Duggan, Contract Manager for Customer Solutions, Electric Ireland
After implementing real-time conversation analytics with EdgeTier, the team could see what was driving contact as it happened. Anomalies were flagged immediately. One unexpected finding: a meaningful proportion of the email backlog was spam that agents were manually processing. Once surfaced and quantified, it could be automated away. The results across the programme were a 21% improvement in CSAT, a 37% reduction in email volumes, and a 19% improvement in first contact resolution.
Novibet operates in iGaming, an industry where the variety of contact reasons is unusually high and the margin for missing a critical issue is thin. Before EdgeTier’s VoC analytics, monitoring meant manual quality assurance by listening to calls, reading through conversations, hoping the sample was representative enough to reveal a pattern. Website outages, payment errors, and player frustrations were often identified only after they had already escalated.
“You’ve got an issue, but you don’t know how many people are affected. You don’t know the scale. You don’t even know if it’s real.” – Afroditi Pina, Director of Customer Service, Novibet
Shifting to automated 100% conversation coverage changed both the speed and the scope of what the team could see. Within six months, efficiency savings had reached the equivalent of six full-time employee costs, driven by the elimination of manual categorisation work, faster issue detection, and more precisely targeted agent coaching. The platform also surfaced responsible gambling-related conversations in real time, a category where missing an interaction carries risk well beyond the operational.
McKinsey documented a financial services company experiencing a high volume of repeat contacts: for every 100 customer issues raised, the contact centre received more than 160 calls. Analytics revealed three distinct driver groups: customers calling repeatedly for status updates on already-resolved issues, customers who would try a different agent if they did not like the answer from the first, and agents who were spending disproportionate time on low-complexity queries. With that picture in hand, the firm identified an opportunity to reduce repeat calls by 15 percent. The insight was not new to anyone on the floor. The ability to quantify it, segment it, and present it as a structured problem was.
Vodafone deployed an AI-driven customer analytics system across its contact centre operations, alongside an upgraded version of its virtual assistant. By analysing what customers were actually asking, and why the previous system was failing to resolve it, the team redesigned the assistant’s logic around real contact patterns rather than assumed ones. The upgraded assistant showed a 50% improvement in first-time resolution of complex queries including billing issues. The routing improvements that followed were themselves informed by the conversation data: customers whose queries matched known escalation patterns were moved directly to the appropriate team without the intermediate transfer step.
The thread running through all of these cases is the same. The information existed before the analytics programme. Agents knew the patterns. The difference is that VoC analytics made it possible to quantify the scale, prove the root cause, and give other teams something concrete to act on.
Frequently asked questions
Surveys capture structured feedback from the customers who choose to respond, typically a small percentage of total contacts. VoC analytics works across every interaction without requiring any action from the customer. The practical difference is coverage and specificity: surveys tell you how customers feel in aggregate; conversation analytics tells you what specific customers are experiencing and how many others share that experience. Gartner has predicted that by 2025, 60% of organisations with a VoC programme will move beyond surveys to include voice and text sources, a shift that reflects the limits of survey-only approaches.
Manually reviewing thousands of conversations a week is not feasible, and even where it is attempted, the results drift with reviewer fatigue and inconsistency. AI handles classification, sentiment detection, and anomaly identification continuously at 100% coverage. The same criteria apply to every conversation, which removes the subjectivity that comes with human review. The result is that insights are available in near real time rather than at the end of a reporting cycle, and patterns are visible at a level of granularity that manual processes would never catch.
A VoC programme that shares insights only within the contact centre captures a fraction of its potential value. Product teams benefit from understanding what is confusing or frustrating customers about specific features. Operations and logistics teams need to see the issues driving avoidable contact in their domain. Marketing benefits from knowing how campaigns are landing with real customers, not survey respondents. Leadership benefits from a continuous, unfiltered read on customer experience health. The contact centre is the data source. The business is the audience.
Ideally all of them: inbound calls via transcription, live chat, email, and messaging. The more channels included, the more complete the picture. Channel-specific analysis is also worth doing, because customers who call are often dealing with different issues from those who email, and the nature of friction varies. Missing a high-volume channel creates a blind spot that can skew your understanding of what is actually driving contact and inflate perceived performance on the metrics you are tracking.
Initial insights typically surface within days of implementation for contact centres with meaningful volume. A reliable picture of recurring themes and emerging patterns usually develops over the first four to six weeks. The more significant variable is how quickly the organisation can act on what it learns. Contact centres that have built clear feedback loops to product and operations teams see faster commercial impact than those where insights accumulate in a dashboard that only the support team accesses.
Yes, and this is one of the more commercially significant applications. Conversations often reveal dissatisfaction long before a customer cancels. Repeated contacts on unresolved issues, declining sentiment around a specific product area, or spikes in cancellation-related language are all detectable early warning signals. Organisations that route these signals to retention teams, or trigger proactive outreach based on them, see measurable improvements in churn rates. The contact centre already has this information. The question is whether anyone is acting on it.
Most contact centres sit on an enormous amount of customer intelligence and have no systematic way to use it. EdgeTier is built to change that. The platform analyses 100% of customer conversations in real time, turning interaction data into structured insight that teams across the business can act on.
If your contact centre is handling significant volumes, the insights are already there. The question is whether you have the tools to find them.
This article originally appeared on Edge Signals – Bart Lehane’s LinkedIn newsletter on customer experience, analytics, and AI. Follow for
Summer peak is THE moment of truth for travel brands. Demand surges, operations get tested, and customers' tolerance for friction
AI quality assurance in a contact centre is the use of artificial intelligence to automatically evaluate every customer interaction against
"We thought at the time that we were putting the customer at the fore. We thought we were doing things right. But in hindsight, we really weren’t because we had no real-time insights whatsoever into customer issues."
"EdgeTier is really shining when it comes to responsible gambling. We can proactively track critical issues and take actions, reducing human error."
"I specifically liked the flexibility. I liked the can-do attitude. I always felt supported. There hasn’t been any single point in our journey where EdgeTier has said no."



Let us help your company go from reactive to proactive customer support.
Unlock AI Insights