How Real-Time Anomaly Detection Transforms Retail Contact Centres During the Festive Season
Retail contact centres face intense pressure during the festive period and January returns surge. This article explains how real-time anomaly
This article originally appeared on Edge Signals – Bart Lehane’s LinkedIn newsletter on customer experience, analytics, and AI. Follow for future insights like this!Customer experience is undergoing a major shift in 2026 as AI maturity, regulation, speed expectations, and the role of human agents evolve. This article explores the six trends that will most significantly…

| This article originally appeared on Edge Signals – Bart Lehane’s LinkedIn newsletter on customer experience, analytics, and AI. Follow for future insights like this! Customer experience is undergoing a major shift in 2026 as AI maturity, regulation, speed expectations, and the role of human agents evolve. This article explores the six trends that will most significantly reshape CX operations and customer expectations in the year ahead. You’ll learn: ✔ The accelerating gap between AI capability and organisational adoption ✔ How AI is moving from assistant to autonomous operator ✔ The governance impact of the EU AI Act ✔ Why QA must expand to cover AI-driven interactions ✔ How rising speed expectations redefine “good CX” ✔ Why human moments are becoming rare but brand-defining |
CX is entering a pivotal moment, one where technology, regulation, and customer expectations are evolving faster than most organisations can reorient. For years, discussion around “future CX trends” has felt speculative, sometimes vague, and often centred on technology for technology’s sake. But 2026 marks a turning point.
The shifts now taking shape are structural. They will define not only how customers experience brands, but also how CX organisations operate, measure success, staff teams, and design workflows. The gap between businesses that build momentum and those that hesitate is widening – and the cost of hesitation is increasing.
The following six trends are patterns that have already begun to compound. They represent the real areas where CX leaders must focus attention to stay competitive in a world where AI is becoming infrastructure, speed is default, and human interactions are both rarer and more valuable.
When generative AI first broke into mainstream use, reactions were polarised: some declared it transformative; others dismissed it due to mistakes and hallucinations. Both camps underestimated the pace of progress.
What has surprised even seasoned technologists is not that AI improved, but how rapidly it crossed new capability thresholds. The evolution from early LLMs to GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini was a redefinition of possibility. Each generation handles more complexity, more ambiguity, more messy reality.
We’re not experiencing incremental optimisation. We’re witnessing generational leaps.
A useful analogy is the evolution from the original iPhone to the iPhone 4 – not a better phone, but a different device class entirely. That’s where CX-focused AI systems now sit: moving from helpful tools to sophisticated operators capable of understanding intent, context, and outcomes.
A “wait and see” approach is becoming a strategic disadvantage.
Organisations deploying AI now are developing:
McKinsey reports that only 1% of companies have reached true AI maturity. There is still a chance to be a fast follower, but the window is closing – not because the technology is inaccessible, but because learning curves compound.
Those who delay will face a knowledge deficit, not just a technology deficit.
Most organisations still interact with AI as if it were an advanced search engine – reactive, user-prompted, and output-driven. But the next stage of AI adoption involves assigning objectives, not tasks.
CX leaders are beginning to embrace AI systems that operate independently within defined guardrails.
For example, one organisation recently deployed an AI workflow to re-engage thousands of sponsors at scale. The system pulled CRM data, analysed engagement patterns, generated tailored materials, and executed outreach – all with only human oversight, not human labour.
The shift is profound:
AI is is initiating work, managing processes, and surfacing insights proactively.
Instead of asking AI to summarise, teams will ask AI to observe, diagnose, and prioritise.
As AI assumes execution, human work becomes higher leverage:
Contact centres structured around volume and repeatability will need to redesign roles, metrics, and workflows. By mid-2026, the divide between organisations that prepare for this hybrid future and those that don’t will be glaring.
When GDPR arrived, it demanded immediate changes: consent frameworks, privacy policies, data access processes, and internal controls. Few enjoyed the process, but the outcome was undeniable. Organisations became more disciplined and intentional about data.
The EU AI Act will have similar impact.
It introduces governance obligations that raise the bar on:
It is a catalyst for AI maturity. For many teams, compliance activities (risk logs, auditing processes, performance monitoring, explainability requirements) will be their first exposure to structured AI governance.
Zendesk research shows:
Regulation will force that gap to close.
The companies that have invested in governance – data quality, output validation, AI QA, ethical standards – will find the transition manageable. Others will scramble, introducing risk, cost, and delay.
Just as strong security practices became a sales differentiator, responsible AI will become a trust differentiator. Compliance becomes a moat; customers and partners choose vendors who can demonstrate safety and clarity.
A silent risk is emerging: as AI takes over more customer-facing tasks, many organisations have less visibility, not more, into service quality.
Traditional QA frameworks were built for human conversations. They examined tone, accuracy, compliance, empathy, and problem resolution. But modern CX includes:
Most organisations measure these systems with metrics like containment rate, which often reveal little about whether a customer had a trustworthy or helpful experience.
Without rigorous AI QA, teams risk:
Those that modernise QA will gain unprecedented visibility and control. Those that don’t will operate blind.
Learn more: When Chatbots go Wrong: The New Risk Landscape in AI Customer Service
Customer expectation around speed has shifted from “important” to “non-negotiable.” Zendesk data shows:
AI has fundamentally recalibrated what “fast service” means. Once customers experience instantaneous resolution for simple tasks, every delay feels frictional.
After a customer updates an address in 30 seconds via automation, waiting two days for another routine request feels archaic.
It’s no longer just about response time. Teams must deliver:
What was considered excellent in 2024 will feel outdated in 2026. Stagnant benchmarks give a false sense of security, meanwhile, customer expectations accelerate ahead of operational readiness.
As AI automates repetitive, procedural, or transactional work, human interactions will increasingly sit at the extremes of complexity and emotion.
The paradox is powerful: the fewer human interactions customers have, the more those moments will shape loyalty.
You won’t remember the bot that updated your subscription. You will remember the human who solved the stressful, unusual, or high-stakes issue that mattered.
Think of it like dining:
This means building:
Contact centres that treat all interactions the same will fail to excel in either domain. Leaders will treat automation and human experience as two distinct strategic layers.
Human roles will become more specialised:
Training, hiring, and coaching must evolve accordingly.
Every trend points toward the same fundamental shift:
AI is becoming embedded infrastructure, not an optional enhancement.
As that baseline rises, leadership isn’t defined by flashy use cases but by the organisations that:
2026 won’t reward organisations that simply adopt more AI. It will reward organisations that adapt their operating models to a world where AI is everywhere and expectations never stop rising.
The leaders will build advantages that compound. The laggards will find themselves competing not only with better technology – but with businesses that learned faster, iterated earlier, and evolved their CX DNA.
🔗 Read the full article on Bart Lehane’s LinkedIn post for examples, stories, and community discussion.
Bart Lehane is the Co-founder & CCO at EdgeTier and a PhD engineer who’s spent 20+ years building and delivering advanced technology. His background spans applied research, software development, and product management. His interests lie at the intersection of CX, AI, and tech.
Retail contact centres face intense pressure during the festive period and January returns surge. This article explains how real-time anomaly
Strong emotions in customer conversations are easy to miss – not because teams don’t care, but because frustration, confusion, and
Based on a recent talk at Contact Centre Expo Customer experience is supposed to be a priority. We all say
"We’re a big business, so getting the right people to agree and fix something hasn’t always been easy. Now we’ve got one version of the truth—it’s much easier to align and act"
"I specifically liked the flexibility. I liked the can-do attitude. I always felt supported. There hasn’t been any single point in our journey where EdgeTier has said no."
"EdgeTier is really shining when it comes to responsible gambling. We can proactively track critical issues and take actions, reducing human error."



Let us help your company go from reactive to proactive customer support.
Unlock AI Insights